FAccT '21: Proceedings of the 2021 ACM Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency March 2021 Pages 272 https://doi.org/10.1145/3442188.3445891 Those who do not pre-register KDD 2022 (acceptance rate: 14.99%)
towards more ethical computing scholarship in future years. Settings such as lending and policing can be modeled by a centralized agent allocating a scarce resource (e.g. ACM FAccT 2022 [Distinguished Paper Award] (acceptance rate: 25%) D. Fu, L. Fang, R. Maciejewski, V. Tovik, and J. formal proceedings. Lilly Irani, University of California, San Diego, Sampath Kannan, University of Pennsylvania. 9. Videos will be manually reviewed before being posted to Hopin; videos without adequate captions or that present other serious accessibility concerns will be returned for revision. Top tier venues in computer science can be thought of as leading conferences such as CVPR, NIPS, ICML, CHI, KDD, ACL, ICWSM, SIGIR, SIGMOD, STOC, or top tier journals. If English style or grammar are issues, please write your review politely, and avoid language that could be perceived as discriminatory. New York, NY, Feb. 25, 2021 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) -- The 2021 ACM Conference on Fairness, Accountability and Transparency (ACM FAccT), to be held virtually from March 3-10, brings together. Models of agent responsiveness, termed "strategic manipulation," analyze the interaction between We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. U.S. policy starts showing an interest in AI ACM FAccT is committed to ensuring that no body is unable to present their work at the in-person conference due to resource constraints, and as such there is a substantial travel scholarship fund available to support in-person attendance. Archival and Non-archival Submissions. In cases where the Program Chairs (PC) have concerns about the ethics of the work in a submission, the PC will consider the ethical soundness and justification of the submission, just as it does its technical soundness. Upon acceptance, the titles, authorship, and abstracts of accepted papers will be released prior to the conference. 3rd FAccTRec Workshop: Responsible Recommendation - ACM Conferences It is okay to be unavailable for part of the review process (e.g., on vacation for a few days), but if you will be unavailable for more than that -- especially during important windows (e.g., discussion, decision-making) -- you must let the Track Chairs know. Authors must omit their names and affiliations from submissions, and avoid obvious identifying statements. Your comments should be detailed, specific, and polite. This paper argues for more caution with the use of counterfactuals when the facts to be Subset selection algorithms are ubiquitous in AI-driven applications, including, online recruiting portals and image search engines, so it is imperative that these tools are not discriminatory on the basis of protected attributes such as gender or race.
Questions? Two natural and competing notions of fairness might be to a) charge each individual Spurious features interfere with the goal of obtaining robust models that perform well across many groups within the population. The ACM Conference for Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency ( FAccT) has decided to suspend its sponsorship relationship with Google, conference sponsorship co-chair and Boise State. effort by your area selections and the abstract of your paper. paper to ACM FAccT. journal: In such cases, we require authors to select the non-archival option for the FAccT submission. There are lots of free options available, here are just a few suggestions: Please try to make your presentation accessible for all. submissions violate our dual submission policy and will be removed from This will allow us to find an alternate reviewer who will be better able to assess the submission. Reviewers will use HotCRP to set conflicts, areas of interest and sub-disciplines, bid for papers, submit your reviews, and participate in discussion. The uploaded videos will be available in the papers virtual booth throughout the conference. While news recommenders help consumers deal with information overload and increase their engagement, their Personalization is pervasive in the online space as it leads to higher efficiency for the user and higher revenue for the platform by individualizing the most relevant content for each user. FAccT papers naturally differ in style and focus from the work featured at other venues. How should the Please describe and consider the strengths of the submission. The cross-disciplinary nature of this conference requires specific attention to the review process. ACM Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency - Wikipedia The previous two conferences had acceptance rates of 25% and attracted attendees from across academia, industry and public policy. In the case of qualitative SH/Law, the work has a clear added value compared to existing literature. FAccT22 has the same acceptance rate of previous editions but the most accepted papers so far - we received almost double the submissions of 2021, and have accepted double the number of papers (181 in total). personal and professional concern, but also a perennial focus of FAccT ACM FAccT 2021 - HotCRP.com papers will be reviewed by experts on the topic, from disciplines as conference, ACM FAccT requires a broad as well as deep set of expertise Providing thorough peer reviews/cross-reviews for the authors to. Evaluation criteria will be the usual scholarly criteria of the chosen area(s) of the paper, including: Area chairs will oversee the reviewing process for papers within their area. loans or police officers) amongst several groups, in order to maximize some objective (e.g. FAccT: Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency. That said, if you think the other reviewers are not correct, you are not required to change your mind. computing in particular. Reviews are due by March 21 11:59 pm AoE. while minimizing harm to the individual), risk mitigation, and post-hoc which area your submission fits under, feel free to contact the Program Optionally, authors can upload supplementary materials (e.g., appendices) with their submission, but reviewers will not be required to read the supplementary materials, so authors are encouraged to use them judiciously. Your overall assessment should reflect whether you believe the paper merits acceptance except for minor revisions. Conference: 12-15 June 2022 Chicago, IL. This is a more robust approach which will work better with our planned back-end workflow. June 12-15, 2023 in Chicago, USA. A shepherd will be assigned to such submissions for the purpose of overseeing the revision process and confirming that the requested revisions are all carried out. Online proceedings sessions will take place between 2100 and 0200 KST (TBC). The research community is young but growing fast. and abstracts up until the full paper submission deadline, however the submission area(s) by Sept 30. Under no circumstances should you attempt to find out the identities of the authors for any of your assigned submissions (e.g., by searching on Google or arXiv). We welcome submissions in the following areas: FAccT is an ACM conference about computing, dedicated to rigorous He. ACM, the Association for Computing Machinery, is the world's largest educational and scientific computing society, uniting educators, researchers, and professionals to inspire dialogue, share resources and address the field's challenges. You should NOT assume that you were assigned a representative sample of submissions, nor should you adjust your scores to match the overall conference acceptance rates. social justice in relation to design of computational systems? Despite vigorous debates about the technical characteristics of risk assessments being deployed in the U.S. criminal justice system, remarkably little research has studied how these tools affect actual decision-making processes. If you believe a paper requires significant revision, or that you would need to review the outcome of the revision in order to vote to accept the paper, you should generally vote to reject. However, Area Chairs and Program Chairs need to understand both the strengths and the weaknesses in order to make an informed decision. Twitter and join our mailing list facct-announce. In industrial computer vision, discretionary decisions surrounding the production of image training data remain widely undocumented. Options and templates are available for both Word and LaTeX users. This process will enable the Program Chairs to better anticipate the submission load and to make necessary adjustments to the program committee. accepted. For Track Chairs and Program Chairs, it provides a basis for decision-making about a submission. After all, risk Kearns, Neel, Roth, and Wu [ICML 2018] recently proposed a notion of rich subgroup fairness intended to bridge the gap between statistical and individual notions of fairness. Michael Kearns,University of Pennsylvania. their submission by the stated deadline will be unable to submit their Authors are not required or expected to submit a response. PDF Four Years of FAccT: A Reflexive, Mixed-Methods Analysis of Research The University of California suspended through 2024 the requirement that applicants from California submit SAT scores, upending the major role standardized testing has played in college admissions. Papers that are neither in ACM format nor follow the simplified 2021. Email Forgot your password? Bedrock concepts in computer science---such China's Social Credit System (SCS, or shehui xinyong tixi) is expected to become the first digitally-implemented nationwide scoring system with the purpose to rate the behavior of citizens, companies, and other entities. FAccTRec 2021: The 4th Workshop on Responsible Recommendation - dl.acm.org and ethnic studies, migration studies, work on disability and other the review process to rapidly respond to queries from the PC regarding Research challenges are not limited to technological solutions regarding potential bias, but include the question of whether decisions should be outsourced to data- and code-driven computing systems. guidelines in shaping study design, analysis, and dissemination. One Label, One Billion Faces: Usage and Consistency of Racial Categories in Computer Vision. FAccT '23: 2022 ACM Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency June 27 - 30, 2023 Chicago , IL , USA (September 2022) This article relies excessively on references to primary sources. If necessary, this can be escalated to the PC chairs. storage of sensitive data, voluntary and informed consent if users are above areas when they register their submissions. sufficient. Acm ccs 2022 accepted papers - emf.pallaalbalzo.it Authors are also responsible for references . Opportunities such as higher education can promote intergenerational mobility, leading individuals to achieve levels of socioeconomic status above that of their parents. IL ,
Always be constructive and help the authors understand your viewpoint, without being dismissive. The submission adequately informs the reader about the research. In this paper, we investigate such online A/B/n Increasingly, programming tasks involve automating and deploying sensitive decision-making processes that may have adverse impacts on individuals or groups of people. Contact the Program Co-chairs: program-chairs@facctconference.org. This will allow us to find an alternate reviewer who will be better able to assess the submission. submission.
judged by the same quality standards, regardless of whether the authors choice of archival and non-archival paper submissions: The non-archival option is offered to ACM Digital Library. program and will be evaluated for their contributions following Embedding captions, or open captions, means that the captions are burnt into the video itself and cannot be removed by the viewer, unlike closed captions, which can be turned on or off by the viewer. Submissions that have placeholder titles and abstracts (e.g., Our results speak to a tension between the desire to keep a proprietary model secret and the ability to offer model explanations. formatting rules, or papers exceeding the specified page length, may be statistics, law, social sciences, the humanities, and education. He. FACCT Conference - Home - ACM Digital Library At least one author of each accepted paper is required to USA, Front matter (Title, Copyright, Contents, Welcome from General Chairs, Welcome from the Program Chairs), FAccT '23: 2022 ACM Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency, Model Reconstruction from Model Explanations, Actionable Recourse in Linear Classification, Efficient Search for Diverse Coherent Explanations, On Human Predictions with Explanations and Predictions of Machine Learning Models: A Case Study on Deception Detection, 50 Years of Test (Un)fairness: Lessons for Machine Learning, Fairness and Abstraction in Sociotechnical Systems, Clear Sanctions, Vague Rewards: How China's Social Credit System Currently Defines "Good" and "Bad" Behavior, A Taxonomy of Ethical Tensions in Inferring Mental Health States from Social Media, Dissecting Racial Bias in an Algorithm that Guides Health Decisions for 70 Million People, Disparate Interactions: An Algorithm-in-the-Loop Analysis of Fairness in Risk Assessments, An Empirical Study of Rich Subgroup Fairness for Machine Learning, The Profiling Potential of Computer Vision and the Challenge of Computational Empiricism, Bias in Bios: A Case Study of Semantic Representation Bias in a High-Stakes Setting, Equality of Voice: Towards Fair Representation in Crowdsourced Top-K Recommendations, Analyzing Biases in Perception of Truth in News Stories and Their Implications for Fact Checking, On Microtargeting Socially Divisive Ads: A Case Study of Russia-Linked Ad Campaigns on Facebook, SIREN: A Simulation Framework for Understanding the Effects of Recommender Systems in Online News Environments, Controlling Polarization in Personalization: An Algorithmic Framework, Fair Algorithms for Learning in Allocation Problems, Fair Allocation through Competitive Equilibrium from Generic Incomes, A Moral Framework for Understanding Fair ML through Economic Models of Equality of Opportunity, Beyond Open vs. Closed: Balancing Individual Privacy and Public Accountability in Data Sharing, Who's the Guinea Pig? FAccT papers naturally differ in style and focus from the work featured at other venues. Once the peer-reviews are in, the Track Chair decides on whether or not the paper will receive a cross-disciplinary review based on its initial peer review score. Archival papers The PC chairs consider this to be an integral part of the reviewing process and a foundational step in creating and constructing impactful interdisciplinary work. insufficiently addressed issues in computing such as: How do algorithmic These reviews . Videos will also be archived on the FAccT YouTube channel after the conference. Write thoughtful and constructive reviews. Specifically, something similar to the following should appear near the top of your .tex document \documentclass[manuscript,screen,review,anonymous]{acmart}. disclosure of audits. Recent research taking issue with such opacity has proposed standardized processes for dataset documentation. The latest data we have shows there are 11,240 reviews in the system. Authors unsure about topical fit or ethical (27.9% acceptance rate). We will be using the new ACM workflow for formatting manuscripts, described here. This interdisciplinary conference is seeing much more interest in these issues across organizations, with industry scholars in particular developing more research in these areas. accountability, and transparency in socio-technical systems. . Authors must omit their names and affiliations from submissions, and avoid obvious identifying statements. FAccT'22 has the same acceptance rate of previous editions but the most accepted papers so far - we received almost double the submissions of 2021, and have accepted double the number of papers (181 in total). Submissions that do not comply with this policy will be rejected without review. faced in their work. To this end, we adopt a double-blind peer review system consisting of. New York, NY, February 25, 2021 - The 2021 ACM Conference on Fairness, Accountability and Transparency (ACM FAccT) , to be held virtually from March 3-10, brings together researchers and practitioners interested in fairness, accountability, and transparency in socio-technical systems. https://eur-lex.europa.eu/eli/reg/2016/679/oj T. Kamishima, P.-N. Schwab, and M. D. Ekstrand. in order for the paper to appear in the conference proceedings in the avoid influencing their evaluations. In-person proceedings sessions will take place between 1100 and 1800 KST. [Feb. [Feb. Search Search. For authors, it provides transparency into our decisions and, as such, guidance for revising their work for rebuttal and for their final presentation.
Archival papers ACM ethics guidelines. last year, papers and position papers are in scope for the ACM FAT* is an international and interdisciplinary peer-reviewed conference that seeks to publish and present the best work examining the fairness, accountability, and transparency of algorithmic systems. Please be diligent about avoiding comments regarding English style or grammar that may be interpreted as implying the author is "foreign" or "non-native". Zaid Khan To reconcile algorithmic Price discrimination - offering different prices to different customers - has become common practice. Consider a cost-sharing game with players of different costs: an example might be an insurance company calculating premiums for a population of mixed-risk individuals. Strong work makes a contribution that his important to the FAccT academic field. Feb 22, 2021: Our paper "One Label, One Billion Faces . In Proceedings of the 2021 ACM Conference vised lexical semantic change detection. research for approval by each authors institutional ethics review body loans given that are repaid, or criminals that are Two food banks catering to populations of different sizes with different needs must divide among themselves a donation of food items. This also provides transparency and guidance to authors interested in improving their work for the ACM FAT* audience. Always be constructive and help the authors understand your viewpoint, without being dismissive or using inappropriate language. and do consider changing your mind in light of their comments, if appropriate. ACM FAccT - FAccT 2022 - Reviewing Guide The work appropriately represents the scholarship across cultural boundaries. ACM FAccT maintains confidentiality of submitted material. For media inquiries, please contact press@facctconference.org; FAccT: Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency. form. compare the submission to other submissions. The author responses are intended to allow the authors to concisely identify perceived mistakes of fact or reasoning in the reviews that foundationally affect the assessment about their work. The cross-disciplinary review is intended to provide insight from a different field about the potential broader impact of the work, context for the stated claims and related work (in areas/field beyond the direct one of the submission), and constructive feedback and potential concerns from a different perspective. Each paper will be allocated to *one* proceedings session during the conference, either as part of the in-person program in Seoul. ACM FAccT - FAccT 2022 - Reviewing Guide practice at the intersection of many disciplines. Acceptance rates for the major top-tier AI-related conferences Natural Language Processing and Computational Linguistics Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition Machine Learning and Learning Theory Artificial Intelligence Data Mining and Information Retrieval Speech and Signal Processing Note: Some Stats about CHI 2021 Papers | CHI 2021 Authors will be asked to select one or more of the above areas when they register their submissions. FAccT '21: 2021 ACM Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency Virtual Event Canada March 3 - 10, 2021 ISBN: 978-1-4503-8309-7 Published: 01 March 2021 Sponsors: ACM Recommend ACM DL ALREADY A SUBSCRIBER? We recommend using 16:9 Aspect Ratio, and minimum 1080p resolution. The Track Chairs and Program Chairs will interpret these scores via the following scale. What kinds of marginalization are relevant to appendices) with their submission, but reviewers will not be required to
The State of AI in 9 Charts - Stanford HAI Switching from archival to non-archival ethical considerations. For example, if College A has 100,000 applicants and accepts 5,000 students, their acceptance rate is 5%. DO NOT talk to anyoneincluding other reviewers or Track co-Chairsabout submissions that are assigned to you without prior approval from the submissions Track Chair; other reviewers or Track co-Chairs may have conflicts with these submissions. Extensions of IL ,
ACM FAccT uses a mutually Note Author responses: After receiving reviews, authors will have a brief period to offer responses to the reviews. In a very limited number of cases where an otherwise excellent paper requires a significant but actionable revision, Program Chairs can select such submissions for shepherding . been previously published, or have been accepted for publication. In this setting the decision-maker's fairness policy governs the number of With rapid progress in artificial intelligence (AI), popularity of generative art has grown substantially. ACM FAccT 2021 offers authors the FAccTRec 2021: The 4th Workshop on Responsible - ACM Conferences All accepted papers will also be presented in a proceedings session with live Q&A. They should be respected and taken into account, but their comments should not be confused with the peer review. Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency (FAccT) for socio-tech- nicalsystemshasbeenathrivingareaofresearchinrecentyears.An ACM conference bearing the same name has been the central venue for scholars in this area to come together, provide peer feedback to one another, and publish their work. Switching from archival to non-archival option after submission is discouraged, but justified requests from authors will be examined by PC Chairs on a case-by-case basis. authors will be examined by PC Chairs on a case-by-case basis. As of May 9, about 65% of registrations include in-person attendance. It is calculated by dividing the number of accepted students by the number of total applicants. ACM FAccT - 2022 Instructions for Authors This topic has received extensive attention We study the problem of learning fair prediction models for unseen test sets distributed differently from the train set. Authors are encouraged to reflect on these The results or conclusions are important for the FAccT academic field. Association tion, pages 208-213, Barcelona (online). Caliskan_CV_Brookings.pdf - AYLIN CALISKAN Assistant It will help the Area Chairs and Program Chairs decide whether to accept the submissions. Weve marked the sections of this document with . When appropriate, authors are encouraged to include a subsection describing these issues. May 8-13, 2021 Yokohama, Japan May 8-13, 2021 Online Virtual Conference . not submit papers that are identical, or substantially similar to DO NOT talk to anyone about specific submissions, reviews, or discussions of papers that you reviewed after decisions have been announced. We consider your role as program chairs, track chairs and program committee members as essential in seeing to it that the community and the ACM FAT* conference grow to be mature, rigorous, and exciting. AI ethics research conference suspends Google sponsorship If you accidentally find out the identities of the authors, please do not divulge the identities to anyone, but do tell your Track Chair that this has happened and make a note of this in the Confidential Comments to Track Chairs and PC Chairs text field. Researchers postulate that this may be a We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. The purpose of the longer video is to ensure that conference delegates who are unable to attend a proceedings session can see a version of your presentation asynchronously, and engage with your work, leaving comments and questions in the booth. beneficence (maximizing the benefits to an individual or to society In 2022 ACM Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency, FAccT '22, pages 1240-1256, New York, NY, USA, June 2022. On the Optimization of Benefit to Cost Ratios for Public Sector content of author rebuttals will be provided when the rebuttal period Thus, we seek an area and discipline-specific quality assessment for each submission. De Gregorio G and Ranchordas S Breaking Down Information Silos with Big Data: A Legal Analysis of Data Sharing.