So maybe Ventoy also need a shim as fedora/ubuntu does. If you use Rufus to write the same ISO file to the same USB stick and boot in your computer. It should be specially noted that, no matter USB drive or local disk, all the data will be lost after install Ventoy, please be very careful. Customizing installed software before installing LM. Because if I know you ever used Ventoy in a Secure Boot enabled environment, I can now run any malicious payload I want at the UEFI level, on your computer. In Windows, Ventoy2Disk.exe will only list the device removable and in USB interface type by default. Thanks! Yes, at this point you have the same exact image as I have. In Windows, Ventoy2Disk.exe will only list the device removable and in USB interface type by default. I hope there will be no issues in this adoption. Yes, I already understood my mistake. ventoy maybe the image does not support x64 uefi https://nyancat.fandom.com/wiki/MEMZ_Nyan_Cat https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-mv6Cbew_y8&t=1m13s. I should also note that the key used in Ventoy is the same used in Super UEFIinSecureBoot Disk, my key. 3. openSUSE-Tumbleweed-XFCE-Live-x86_64-Snapshot20200402-Media - 925 MB, star-kirk-2.1.0-xfce-amd64-live.iso - 518 MB, Porteus-CINNAMON-v5.0rc1-x86_64.iso - 300 MB Shim silently loads any file signed with its embedded key, but shows a signature violation message upon loading another file, asking to enroll its hash or certificate. The Flex image does not support BIOS\Legacy boot - only UEFI64. I would say that it probably makes sense to first see what LoadImage()/StarImage() let through in an SB enabled environment (provided that this is what Ventoy/GRUB uses behind the scenes, which I'm not too sure about), and then decide if it's worth/possible to let users choose to run unsigned bootloaders. I tested live GeckoLinux STATIC Plasma 152 (based on openSUSE) with ventoy-1.0.15. Is it possible to make a UEFI bootable arch USB? can u fix now ? Hi, Gentoo LiveDVD doesn't work, when I try to boot it, It's showing up the GRUB CLI Please thoroughly test the archive and give your feedback, what works and what don't. For more information on how to download and install Ventoy on Windows 10/11, we have a guide for that. same here on ThinkPad x13 as for @rderooy Secure Boot is disabled in the BIOS on both systems, and the ISO boots just fine if I write it directly to a USB stick with Fedora Image Writer. @ventoy I have tested on laptop Lenovo Ideapad Z570 and Memtest86-4.3.7.iso and ipxe.iso gived same error but with additional information: netboot.xyz-efi.iso (v2.0.17), manjaro-gnome-20.0.3-200606-linux56.iso, Windows10_PLx64_2004.iso worked fine. The boot.wim mode appears to be over 500MB. Maybe the image does not support X64 UEFI. Latest Ventoy release introduces experimental IMG format support 1.- comprobar que la imagen que tienes sea de 64 bits size: 589 (617756672 byte) Yes. Google for how to make an iso uefi bootable for more info. The Ultimate Linux USB : r/linuxmasterrace - reddit If you burn the image to a CD, and use a USB CD drive, I bet you find it will install fine. In this case you must take care about the list and make sure to select the right disk. I would also like to point out that I reported the issue as a general remark to help with Ventoy development, after looking at the manner in which Ventoy was addressing the Secure Boot problem (and finding an issue there), rather than as an actual Ventoy user. The MX21_February_x64.iso seems OK in VirtualBox for me. If you really want to mount it, you can use the experimental option VTOY_LINUX_REMOUNT in Global Control Plugin. But, whereas this is good security practice, that is not a requirement. The main annoyance in my view is that it requires 2 points of contact for security updates (per https://github.com/rhboot/shim-review) and that I have some doubts that Microsoft will allow anything but a formal organization with more than a couple of people to become a SHIM provider. Which means that, if you have a TPM chip, then it certainly makes little sense to want to use its features with Secure Boot disabled. da1: quirks=0x2. I have some systems which won't offer legacy boot option if UEFI is present at the same time. So, I'm trying to install Arch, but after selecting Arch from Ventoy I keep getting told that "No Bootfile found for UEFI! screenshots if possible And unfortunately, because Ventoy is derived from GRUB 2.0, the only way it could run in a Secure Boot environment (without using MokManager) is if it is loaded through a SHIM. You were able to use TPM for disk encryption long before Secure Boot, and rightfully so, since the process of storing and using data encryption keys is completely different from the process of storing and using trust chain keys to validate binary executables (being able to decrypt something is very different from being able to trust something). As with pretty much any other security solution, the point of Secure Boot is mitigation ("If you have enabled Secure Boot then it means you want to be notified about bootloaders that do not match the signatures you allow") and right now, Ventoy results in a complete bypass of this mitigation, which is why I raised this matter. Have a question about this project? This means current is ARM64 UEFI mode. Intel Sunrise Point-LP, Intel Kaby Lake-R, @chromer030 Your favorite, APorteus was done with legacy & UEFI You can install Ventoy to USB drive, Removable HD, SD Card, SATA HDD, SSD, NVMe . Else I would have disabled Secure Boot altogether, since the end result it the same. also for my friend's at OpenMandriva *waaavvvveee* Now there's no need to format the disk again and again or to extract anything-- with Ventoy simply copy the ISO file to the USB drive and boot it. Ctrl+i to change boot mode of some ISOs to be more compatible Ctrl+w to use wimboot to boot Windows and WinPE ISOs (e.g. VentoyU allows users to update and install ISO files on the USB drive. But i have added ISO file by Rufus. 2.-verificar que la arquitectura de la imagen iso sea compatible con el procesador, 1.-modo uefi: Background Some of us have bad habits when using USB flash drive and often pull it out directly. Sign in Parrot-security-4.9.1_x64.iso - 3.8 GB, eos-eos3.7-amd64-amd64.200310-013107.base.iso - 2.83 GB, minimal_linux_live_15-Dec-2019_64-bit_mixed.iso - 18.9 MB, OracleLinux-R7-U3-Server-x86_64-dvd.iso - 4.64 GB, backbox-6-desktop-amd64.iso - 2.51 GB Besides, you can try a linux iso file, for example ubuntu-20.04-desktop-amd64.iso, I have the same for Memtest86-4.3.7.iso and ipxe.iso but works fine with netboot.xyz-efi.iso (v2.0.17), manjaro-gnome-20.0.3-200606-linux56.iso, Windows10_PLx64_2004.iso and HBCD_PE_x64.iso (v1.0.1) Lenovo Ideapad Z580. @pbatard, have you tested it? ia32 . Ventoy The only thing that changed is that the " No bootfile found for UEFI!" By the way, this issue could be closed, couldn't it? I've tested it with Microsoft-signed binaries, custom-signed binaries, ubuntu ISO file (which chainloads own shim grub signed with Canonical key) all work fine. This same image I boot regularly on VMware UEFI. For example, how to get Ventoy's grub signed with MS key. On the other hand, the expectation is that most users would only get the warning very occasionally, and you definitely want to bring to their attention that they might want to be careful about the current bootloader they are trying to boot, in case they haven't paid that much attention to where they got their image @ventoy, @pbatard, any comments on my solution? So use ctrl+w before selecting the ISO. But Ventoy currently does. This is also known as file-rolller. @ValdikSS, I'm afraid I am fairly busy right now and, technically for me, investing time on this can be seen as going towards helping a "competing" product (since I am the creator of Rufus, though I genuinely don't have a problem with healthy competition and I'm quite happy to direct folks, who've been asking to produce a version of Rufus with multiboot for years, to use Ventoy instead), whereas I could certainly use that time to improve my own software . So it is impossible to get these ISOs to work with ventoy without enabling legacy support in the bios settings? So all Ventoy's behavior doesn't change the secure boot policy. I can provide an option in ventoy.json for user who want to bypass secure boot. Topics in this forum are automatically closed 6 months after creation. Will there be any? a media that was created without using Ventoy) running in a Secure Boot environment, so if your point is that because Ventoy uses a means to inject content that Microsoft has chosen not to secure, it makes the whole point of checking Secure Boot useless, then that reasoning logically also applies to official unmodified retail Windows ISOs, because you might as well tell everyone who created a Windows installation media (using the MCT for instance): "There's really no point in having Secure Boot enabled on your system, since someone can just create a Windows media with a malicious Windows\System32\winpeshl.exe payload to compromise your system at early boottime anyway" Again, if someone has Secure Boot enabled, and did not whitelist a third party UEFI bootloader themselves, then they will expect the system to warn them in that third party bootloader fails Secure Boot validation, regardless of whether they did enrol a bootloader that chain loaded that third party bootloader. Asks for full pathname of shell. I've hacked-up PreLoader once again and managed to cleanly chainload Ubuntu ISO with Secure Boot enabled. Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community. You don't need anything special to create a UEFI bootable Arch USB. 6. That's actually very hard to do, and IMO is pointless in Ventoy case. Ventoy is an open source tool that lets you create a bootable USB drive for ISO files. In Ventoy I had enabled Secure Boot and GPT. Well occasionally send you account related emails. The only way to prevent misuse when booting from USB is to set a BIOS password (and perhaps a boot password), set the BIOS to not boot from USB and it won't hurt to also use an encrypted filesystem for the OS on the hard disk (bitlocker/LUKS). @pbatard unsigned kernel still can not be booted. I tested it but trying to boot it will fail with an I/O error. The fact that it's also able to check if a signed USB installer wasn't tampered with is just a nice bonus. 22H2 works on Ventoy 1.0.80. Thanks a lot. They do not provide a legacy boot option if there is a fat partition with an /EFI folder on it. Is there a way to force Ventoy to boot in Legacy mode? 1All the steps bellow only need to be done once for each computer when booting Ventoy at the first time. By clicking Sign up for GitHub, you agree to our terms of service and Go to This PC in the File Explorer, then open the drive where you installed Ventoy. its existence because of the context of the error message. espero les sirva, pueden usar rufus, ventoy, easy to boot, etc. Well occasionally send you account related emails. By clicking Sign up for GitHub, you agree to our terms of service and Maybe the image does not support X64 UEFI! Paragon ExtFS for Windows
I'll fix it. "+String(e)+r);return new Intl.NumberFormat('en-US').format(Math.round(569086*a+n))}var rng=document.querySelector("#restoro-downloads");rng.innerHTML=gennr();rng.removeAttribute("id");var restoroDownloadLink=document.querySelector("#restoro-download-link"),restoroDownloadArrow=document.querySelector(".restoro-download-arrow"),restoroCloseArrow=document.querySelector("#close-restoro-download-arrow");if(window.navigator.vendor=="Google Inc."){restoroDownloadLink.addEventListener("click",function(){setTimeout(function(){restoroDownloadArrow.style.display="flex"},500),restoroCloseArrow.addEventListener("click",function(){restoroDownloadArrow.style.display="none"})});}. Now, that one can currently break the trust chain somewhere down the line, by inserting a malicious program at the first level where the trust stops being validated, which, incidentally, as a method (since I am NOT calling Ventoy malicious here) is very similar to what Ventoy is doing for Windows boot, is irrelevant to the matter, because one can very much conceive an OS that is being secured all the way (and, once again, if Microsoft were to start doing just that, then that would most likely mark the end of being able to use Ventoy with Windows ISOs since it would no longer be able to inject an executable that isn't signed by Microsoft as part of the boot process) and that validates the signature of every single binary it runs along the way which means that the trust chain needs to start somewhere and (as far as user providable binaries are concerned) that trust chain starts with Secure Boot. I made Super UEFIinSecureBoot Disk with that exact purpose: to bypass Secure Boot validation policy. wifislax64-2.1-final.iso - 2 GB, obarun-JWM-2020.03.01-x86_64.iso - 1.6 GB, MiniTool_Partition_Wizard_10.2.3_Technician_WinPE.iso - 350 MB, artix-cinnamon-s6-20200210-x86_64.iso - 1.88 GB, Parrot-security-4.8_x64.iso - 4.03 GB Ventoy - Easy2Boot Currently there is only a Secure boot support option for check. This will disable validation policy override, making Secure Book work as desired: it will load only signed files (+ files signed with SHIM MOK key). Hi, HDClone can be booted by Ventoy in Memdisk mode for legacy BIOS, you try Ventoy 1.0.08 beta2. If you have a faulty USB stick, then youre likely to encounter booting issues. All other distros can not be booted. You can repair the drive or replace it. I used Rufus on a new USB with the same iso image, and when I booted to it with UEFI it booted successfully. Ventoy will search all the directories and sub directories recursively to find all the iso files and list them in the boot menu. snallinux-.6-x86_64.iso - 1.40 GB Astra Linux , supports UEFI , booting successfully. You can copy several ISO files at a time, and Ventoy will offer a boot menu where you can select them. /s. Openbsd is based. In Windows, some processes will occupy the USB drive, and Ventoy2Disk.exe cannot obtain the control right of the USB drive, so that the device cannot be listed. mishab_mizzunet 1 yr. ago I'm hoping other people can test and report because it will most likely be a few weeks before this can make it to the top of my priority list @ventoy, are you interested in a proper implementation of Secure Boot support? How to make sure that only valid .efi file can be loaded. So it is pointless for Ventoy to only boot Secure EFI files once the user has 'whitelisted' it. Have a question about this project? A least, I'd expect that a tutorial that advises a user to modify a JSON file to have done a bit more research into the topic and provide better advice. The idea that Ventoy users "should know what they are getting into" or that "it's pointless to check UEFI bootloaders for Secure Boot" once Ventoy has been enrolled is disingenuous at best. Therefore, Ventoy/Grub should be altered as follows: Hopefully this shouldn't be too complex to add, though it may require some research, and modifying GRUB to do just that might require a lot of work. But, just like GRUB, I assert that this matter needs to be treated as a bug that warrants fixing, which is the reason I created this issue in the first place. Hey, I have encountered the same problem and I found that after deleting the "System Volume Information" folder on Ventoy partition of the USB disk, it can boot now. 10 comments andycuong commented on Mar 17, 2021 completed meeuw mentioned this issue on Jul 31, 2021 [issue]: Can't boot Ventoy UEFI Native (Without CSM) on HP ProBook 640g1 #1031 It does not contain efi boot files. Win10_21H2_BrazilianPortuguese_x64.iso also boots fine in Legacy mode on IdeaPad 300 with Ventoy 1.0.57. Ventoy 1.0.55 is available already for download. These WinPE have different user scripts inside the ISO files. But when I try to boot it with ventoy it does not boot and says the message "No bootfile found for UEFI". Maybe the image does not support X64 UEFI." UEFI64 Bootfile \EFI\Boot\bootx64.efi is present. ventoy maybe the image does not support x64 uefi - FOTO SKOLA Tried it yesterday. I test it in a VirtualMachine (VMWare with secure boot enabled). Already on GitHub? However, users have reported issues with Ventoy not working properly and encountering booting issues. md5sum 6b6daf649ca44fadbd7081fa0f2f9177 TinyCorePure64-13.1.iso does UEFI64 boot OK I made a VHD of an arch installation and installed the vtoyboot mod and it keeps on giving me the no UEFI error. It seems the original USB drive was bad after all. For these who select to bypass secure boot. MediCAT No bootfile found for UEFI, maybe the image doesnt support ia32 uefi error, asus t100ta Kinda solved: Cant install arch, but can install linux mint 64 bit. You need to create a directory with name ventoy and put ventoy.json in this directory(that is \ventoy\ventoy.json). How to Download Windows 11 ISO and Perform a Clean Install | Beebom So from ventoy 1.0.09, an option for secure boot is added in Ventoy2Disk.exe/Ventoy2Disk.sh and default is disabled. Shim itself is signed with Microsoft key. But, even as I don't actually support the idea that Secure Boot is useless if someone has physical access to the device (that was mostly Steve positing this as a means to justify that not being able to detect Secure Boot breaches on USB media isn't that big a deal), I do believe there currently still exist a bit too many ways to ensure that you can compromise a machine, if you have access to said machine. Ventoy download | SourceForge.net The virtual machine cannot boot. To add Ventoy to Easy2Boot v2, download the latest version of Ventoy Windows .ZIP file and drag-and-drop the Ventoy zip file onto the \e2b\Update agFM\Add_Ventoy.cmd file on the 2nd agFM partition. What matters is what users perceive and expect. Option2: Use Ventoy's grub which is signed with MS key. 1.0.84 MIPS www.ventoy.net ===>
Minor one: when you try to start unsigned .efi executable, error message is shown for a very brief time and quickly disappears. ventoy maybe the image does not support x64 uefi Do I still need to display a warning message? VMware or VirtualBox) ventoy.json should be placed at the 1st partition which has the larger capacity (The partition to store ISO files). Fedora/Ubuntu/xxx). Mybe the image does not support X64 UEFI! The user has Ubuntu, Fedora and OpenSUSE ISOs which they want to load. the main point of Secure Boot is to allow TPM to validate the running system before releasing stored keys, isn't it? Please follow About file checksum to checksum the file. Maybe we should just ask the user 'This file is not signed by Microsoft for 'Secure Boot' - do you still wish to boot from it?' maybe that's changed, or perhaps if there's a setting somewhere to las particiones seran gpt, modo bios That's not at all how I see it (and from what I read above also not @ventoy sees it). If I am using Ventoy and I went the trouble of enrolling it for Secure Boot, I don't expect it to suddenly flag any unsigned or UEFI bootloader or bootloader with a broken signature, as bootable in a Secure Boot enabled environment. if it's possible please add UEFI support for this great distro. Also ZFS is really good. Guid For Ventoy With Secure Boot in UEFI . Option1: Use current solution(Super UEFIinSecureBoot Disk), then user will be clearly told that, in this case, the secure boot will be by passed. But . Fix PC issues and remove viruses now in 3 easy steps: download and install Ventoy on Windows 10/11, Brother Printer Paper Jam: How to Easily Clear It, Fix Missing Dll Files in Windows 10 & Learn what Causes that. Exactly. and leave it up to the user. Option 2: Only boot .efi file with valid signature. Agreed. So even when someone physically unplugs my SSD and installs a malicious bootloader/OS to it, it won't be able to decrypt the main OS partition. Windows 10 32bit No bootfile found for UEFI image does not support x64 UEFI